Forty hours of battery nobody ever got
Battery-related returns down 71%
The headline battery figure was measured with noise cancelling off at half volume — a way nobody listens. Restating it by real listening mode cost the brand a big number and won it the sale.

At a glance
- Category
- Headphones & Earbuds
- Marketplaces
- US
- Revenue at start
- $154k / month
- Claim
- “40 hours” measured with ANC off at 50% volume
- Engagement
- Creative & content + listing SEO
- Timeframe
- 6 months
Results
The challenge
Every brand in the category quotes its best-case battery number, and this one quoted forty hours. The measurement was real — noise cancelling off, volume at half, and the most power-efficient of the codecs the headphones support. In the way people actually use the product, with cancelling on and the volume where commuters set it, the headphones run about twenty-two hours.
That is an excellent figure. It is also barely half of what the box promised, and the customer discovers the difference on day three. Battery complaints drove 8.1% of orders back and a steady stream of three-star reviews written by people who otherwise liked the product — the worst kind, because the reviewer is credible and specific.
Our approach
We replaced one impressive number with three honest ones.
- Battery stated by mode — cancelling on, cancelling off, and transparency — as a single frame in the image stack rather than a footnote.
- Commute framing — hours translated into round trips, which is the unit the shopper is actually budgeting against.
- The headline claim demoted in the title and bullets, with the real-use figure promoted above it.
- Keyword work aimed at endurance intent — the long-battery and long-flight searches, where a credible mid-range figure outperforms an unbelievable headline one.
Inside the ad account

Anonymized account view, rebuilt from the figures reported above: ad sales growing from $69k to $106k a month while ACoS falls from 34% to 24% across the 6-month engagement.
The results
Battery-related returns fell 71%, and conversion rose 39% — on a claim that is numerically smaller than the one it replaced.
The explanation is that a shopper comparing four listings of identical forty-hour claims has no way to believe any of them, while a listing that states its number by condition reads as the one brand being straight with them. Revenue grew 53% and the rating recovered three tenths of a star, because the customers who arrive now are not being set up to be disappointed.
“Legal signed off on forty hours and every competitor claimed the same. It turned out the number was doing nothing except generating returns.”
Services we delivered
Related case studies
Ready to scale your Amazon brand?
Talk to a senior strategist and leave with a growth plan for your store — no obligation.









