Flagging HSA/FSA eligibility on 31 products nobody could filter for
+93% revenue from eligibility flags
Most of the brand's catalog qualifies for tax-advantaged health spending, and none of it was marked as such. Shoppers filtering for eligible products simply never saw it.

At a glance
- Category
- Medical Supplies & Equipment
- Marketplaces
- US
- Revenue at start
- $154k / month
- Finding
- 31 of 44 ASINs qualify, none recognized as eligible
- Engagement
- Full account management + listing SEO
- Timeframe
- 6 months
Results
The challenge
A large share of this category's shoppers are spending pre-tax money with a deadline attached — an HSA card, or an FSA balance that expires in December. They shop differently: they filter for eligible products, they buy in bulk near the end of the year, and they are far less price-sensitive than a shopper spending their own post-tax cash.
The brand was invisible to all of them. Thirty-one of its forty-four products qualified, none were flagged in the catalog data, and the listings never mentioned it. The team knew eligibility existed and assumed it was a payment detail handled at checkout rather than a discovery attribute that decides whether the product appears at all.
Our approach
This was a catalog-data problem wearing a marketing costume.
- Eligibility audit — every ASIN checked against the category's qualification rules, with documentation kept for the ones that needed substantiation.
- Product classification corrected, so the eligibility check Amazon runs on the catalog recognizes the products and they show up in the FSA/HSA-eligible store rather than only in open search.
- Stated on the page too — eligibility called out in the bullets and image stack, because a shopper with a card is looking for permission to spend it here.
- Year-end campaign — budget concentrated into November and December, when expiring balances create a hard deadline no discount can match.
Inside the ad account

Anonymized account view, rebuilt from the figures reported above: ad sales growing from $69k to $134k a month while ACoS falls from 33% to 22% across the 6-month engagement.
The results
Revenue grew 93% to $297k a month: sessions up 18% from a discovery surface the brand had never appeared on, conversion up 36%, and order value up 20% on top.
The order-value rise is the tell: a shopper clearing an expiring balance often buys two products instead of one, and does not compare prices the way a cash buyer does. None of this required a new product, a lower price or a bigger ad budget — thirty-one attribute fields had simply never been completed.
“We thought eligibility was something that happened at checkout. It turns out it decides whether you're in the search results at all.”
Services we delivered
Related case studies
Ready to scale your Amazon brand?
Talk to a senior strategist and leave with a growth plan for your store — no obligation.









