Three label refreshes, three new ASINs, one lost customer base
Repeat purchase rate 21% → 47%
Every packaging update produced a brand-new listing, which reset the reviews, the ranking and (the part nobody had costed) the reorder prompt in every existing customer's account.

At a glance
- Category
- Pantry Staples
- Marketplaces
- US
- Revenue at start
- $164k / month
- Purchase cycle
- Replenished every 5–8 weeks
- History
- 3 packaging refreshes, 3 new listings
- Engagement
- Full account management + listing SEO
- Timeframe
- 9 months
Results
The challenge
A pantry staple earns most of its money from people who have already bought it. They do not search. They reorder, from a purchase history, a saved list or a reorder prompt that points at one specific listing. The brand had broken that link three times in two years, because each time the label was redesigned the team created a fresh listing and quietly retired the old one.
The visible cost was obvious enough: reviews back to zero, ranking back to nothing, and eighteen months of accumulated relevance discarded for a design change the product itself did not undergo. The invisible cost was larger. Thousands of customers whose reorder route pointed at a retired listing found it unavailable and, at that moment, were shown a competitor as the alternative. The brand was re-acquiring its own customers twice a year and paying advertising rates to do it.
Our approach
One product, one enduring listing, and a rule about when that is allowed to change.
- A single permanent listing per product, with images, copy and A+ updated in place whenever the packaging changes.
- An internal rule for new listings (a genuine change in size, count or formulation qualifies; a new label does not), agreed with the design and operations teams rather than imposed on them.
- Legacy listings retired deliberately, with their traffic and their remaining stock routed to the surviving one instead of dying quietly.
- Content continuity: the keyword set and backend terms carried forward intact, so accumulated relevance keeps compounding instead of restarting.
Inside the ad account

Anonymized account view, rebuilt from the figures reported above: ad sales growing from $74k to $116k a month while ACoS falls from 33% to 22% across the 9-month engagement.
The results
The repeat purchase rate more than doubled, from 21% to 47%, and it did so without a loyalty program, a discount or a single retention email.
The hero listing now carries 2,900 reviews rather than 410 (not because the brand generated more, but because it stopped throwing them away), and the resulting authority took the head term from #23 to #6. Revenue grew 63% on a smaller share of new-customer advertising, which is how a staple is supposed to work: sold once and bought many times.
“Every rebrand felt like a fresh start. It was a fresh start, and that was exactly the problem.”
Services we delivered
Related case studies
Ready to scale your Amazon brand?
Talk to a senior strategist and leave with a growth plan for your store, with no obligation.



